Skip to main content

Government liability for created dangers

R. S., a Minor Child, By His Next of Friend and Legal Guardian, v. H.

Updated Nov 11, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
R.S. and T.H. brought a federal civil-rights claim under Section 1983 against Lucas County Children caseworkers Susan Hickey and Rebecca Von Sacken.
Who it affects
The Supreme Court issued no decision on the legal test R.S. and T.H. asked about; its order only refused review of their petition.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for R. S., a Minor Child, By His Next of Friend and Legal Guardian, V. H., et al., Petitioners v. Susan Hickey, et al.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Their petition asks what a plaintiff must prove to show “deliberate indifference” under the rule that can allow a lawsuit when government action creates danger despite immunity.

Their claim involved a rule that can allow a civil-rights lawsuit when government action creates danger despite government immunity.

Question presented

What is needed to show “deliberate indifference” for the state created danger exception to government immunity on a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    May 26, 2026 · Court records

More questions

1
Which workers were named in the lawsuit?
R.S. and T.H. sued Lucas County Children caseworkers Susan Hickey and Rebecca Von Sacken.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 11, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis