Skip to main content

Gun rights while facing charges

TJ Aguilar v. United States

Updated Nov 11, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
TJ Aguilar filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to review his Fifth Circuit case, including whether Congress may criminalize receiving a firearm within one state because the gun crossed state lines earlier and whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) fits the Second Amendment.
What's at stake
Aguilar seeks Supreme Court review of whether the federal firearm restriction can reach the receipt at issue in his case; the Court has not agreed to review that question.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

He also asks the Court to wait for a decision in another case or send his case back for reconsideration based on a later appeals-court decision.

Alongside the firearm questions, Aguilar asks the Court to wait for a decision in Beaird v. United States, reconsider how much weight judges give the Sentencing Guidelines' commentary, or send his case back for another look based on a later appeals-court decision.

Question presented

1. Petitioner asks that the Court should hold this petition pending a decision in Beaird v. United States, No. 25-5343, and alternatively asks whether Stinson v. United States still correctly states the rule for deference that courts must give the commentary of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines? 2. Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand for reconsideration because of an intervening circuit decision that may invalidate precedent on which the panel opinion below relies. 3. May Congress criminalize intrastate firearm receipt based solely on the fact that the firearm crossed state lines at some indefinite point before the defendant received it? 4. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) comports with the Second Amendment.

What happens next

The Court must decide whether to hear the petition. No oral argument or decision window is set before that choice.

Documents

1

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Oct 20, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 11, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis