Skip to main content

Right to a 12-person jury

Chaz Jamal Blake v. Florida

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Chaz Jamal Blake’s filing asks the Supreme Court to review whether someone charged with a serious felony has a constitutional right to a 12-person jury under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. It says the Court agreed to hear the same issue in Kian v.
What's at stake
Blake’s request for Supreme Court review of his 12-person-jury claim remains unresolved; the Court has not agreed to hear it.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

Florida and asks it to pause Blake’s case until Kian is resolved.

Blake’s filing says the Court agreed to hear the same question in Kian v. Florida and asks it to pause his case until Kian is resolved.

Question presented

Whether Petitioner was deprived of his right, under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, to a trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged with a serious felony?

What happens next

The next step is for the Court to decide whether to hear the case. No oral argument or decision window exists unless the Court agrees to review it.

Documents

1

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Oct 8, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis