Skip to main content

False evidence and probable cause

Carsten James Quinlan v. Washington County

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Carsten Quinlan filed a Supreme Court review petition after a federal order threw out his Fourth Amendment suit against Washington County and others.
What's at stake
Quinlan’s challenge to the dismissal remains unresolved; the Supreme Court has not decided whether his suit may proceed.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

He says the exhibits did not establish probable cause (a legal basis for government action), because his complaint alleges the evidence was coerced, fabricated, incomplete, or contradicted by facts favoring him.

Quinlan brought the federal civil-rights suit on his own, claiming a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.

Question presented

Whether a federal court may dismiss a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Fourth Amendment action at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage by treating probable cause as established from complaint exhibits, where the complaint alleges that the investigative evidence supporting probable cause was coerced, fabricated, materially incomplete, or contradicted by exculpatory facts.

What happens next

The Court must decide whether to hear the case. No oral argument is scheduled.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • Case data updated: title

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Jul 21, 2026 · Court records

More questions

3
What does Quinlan allege about the evidence?
He says evidence offered as a legal basis for government action (probable cause) was coerced or fabricated, materially incomplete, or contradicted by facts favoring him.
What does “pro se” mean in this case?
Quinlan brought the lawsuit on his own, without a lawyer.
Which appeals court handled the case?
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis