Skip to main content

Felon gun ban

Jerone Tyrell Holman v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Jerone Tyrell Holman filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to review whether the federal ban on firearm possession by people with felony convictions is unconstitutional and whether courts should give special weight to commentary accompanying federal sentencing guidelines.
What's at stake
Holman’s challenges remain unresolved because the Supreme Court has not agreed to hear them.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

He also asks to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The filing combines a challenge to a federal firearm law with a question about how courts use federal sentencing-guideline commentary.

Question presented

1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional, and if so, when it can be applied constitutionally? 2. Whether deference to the Guidelines Commentary is appropriate and, if so, under what circumstances?

What happens next

The next step is for the Court to decide whether to hear Holman’s petition. No oral argument or decision date has been set.

Documents

2

Docket activity

7
  • Case data updated: title

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 24, 2026 · Court records

  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Jun 11, 2026 · Court records

More questions

1
What fee request did Holman make?
He asked to proceed without paying the Supreme Court filing fee.

Sources

Primary materials from the Court and the parties. Grounded in docket records and cited sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 11, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings