Restraining orders and free speech

1. Whether the First Amendment permits a State to impose and maintain a significant liberty restraint based on speech that does not constitute a true threat. 2. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits a State to impose and maintain a significant liberty restraint through procedures that fail to provide safeguards sufficient to prevent erroneous deprivation of protected interests. 3. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires meaningful judicial review of a significant liberty restraint when a State provides a statutory right to appellate review of that restraint. 4. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits a State to withhold review of a substantial liberty restraint solely because it is labeled “ temporary, ” even when the restraint has significant practical effects and may be extended or renewed.