Skip to main content

No. 24-783October Term 2025Decided Apr 22, 2026Updated Sep 1, 2026

Docket 24-783October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Enbridge Energy v. Nessel

Enbridge Energy, LP, et al., Petitioners v. Dana Nessel, Attorney General of Michigan, on Behalf of the People of the State of Michigan

A late request to move a case from state court to federal court cannot be saved by a district court.

Case status

Decided 8-0 · April 22, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Sotomayor

Read the opinion (PDF)
Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Apr 22, 2026
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardFeb 24, 2026
Decision ReleasedApr 22, 2026
What it's about

Michigan sued Enbridge in state court to stop operation of its Line 5 pipeline, but Enbridge did not try to move the case to federal court until long after the 30-day removal deadline had passed. The Supreme Court held that federal district courts cannot excuse or equitably toll that deadline, so the case had to remain in Michigan state court.

Question presented

Do district courts have the authority to excuse the thirty-day procedural time limit for removal in 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1)?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit / Decision released Apr 22, 2026

Area

Immigration

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

A late request to move a case from state court to federal court cannot be saved by a district court.

Impact

Defendants sued in state court are affected when they want removal (moving a case to federal court). They must file within 30 days, because judges cannot forgive late filings for fairness reasons. For example, Enbridge’s late request meant Michigan’s Line 5 case remained in Michigan state court. The ruling promotes an early, clear decision about where a trial will occur. Late moves could otherwise waste time and money after parties have litigated in one court.

Not official Court text.

Briefing

What it's about

Michigan sued Enbridge in state court to stop operation of its Line 5 pipeline. The Supreme Court decided that federal district courts cannot excuse or extend the 30-day deadline for moving a case from state to federal court, so this case remained in Michigan state court.

Vote

Justice Sotomayor wrote the 8–0 opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Jackson, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch.

The Court ruled that district courts cannot excuse or equitably toll the 30-day removal deadline, but the vote count and opinion lineup are not provided.

Impact

Parties that want to move a lawsuit to federal court must meet the 30-day deadline. For example, a company sued by a state cannot rely on a judge to forgive a late filing.

What's next

Michigan's lawsuit against Enbridge proceeds in Michigan state court. Lower federal courts must apply the 30-day removal deadline without equitable exceptions.

What did the Supreme Court rule in Enbridge Energy v. Nessel?

The Court said federal district courts cannot forgive or extend the 30-day deadline for moving a case from state court to federal court.

Who is affected by the Enbridge Energy decision?

Businesses, states, and other litigants seeking federal court are affected. They must file removal requests within 30 days or remain in state court.

What happens next in Enbridge Energy v. Nessel?

Michigan's lawsuit over Line 5 continues in Michigan state court. Federal district courts must enforce the removal deadline without equitable exceptions.

Timing

Decided April 22, 2026

The Court released its decision 57 days after oral argument on February 24, 2026. The median for cases argued in February is 106 days.

Based on 28 merits cases argued in February since 1995.Argument and decision days

Activity

Docket activity7
  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 1, 2026 | Generated

  • Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - SS

    Apr 22, 2026 | Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Mar 8, 2026 | Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Nessel

    Feb 24, 2026 | Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jan 13, 2025 | Court records