Skip to main content

Trump v. Anderson

Updated Sep 5, 2026

In brief

Colorado could not remove Trump from its presidential primary ballot under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · March 4, 2024 · Per curiam

What it’s about
The Court unanimously reversed Colorado's decision excluding Trump from the ballot under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. It held that states may not enforce Section 3 against federal candidates and officeholders; that responsibility belongs to Congress.
Who it affects
States cannot use Section 3 to remove federal candidates from their ballots. For example, Colorado could not keep Trump off its presidential primary ballot on that basis.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Trump v. Anderson
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The decision prevents different states from reaching different ballot results for federal candidates under Section 3.

Question presented

Does Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualify Donald Trump from holding the office of President of the United States and thus from appearing on Colorado’s 2024 presidential primary ballot?

What the Court decided

Holding

The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court is reversed.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Gorsuch
  5. Kavanaugh
Concurring · 4agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Sotomayor
  2. Kagan
  3. Barrettwrote separately
  4. Jackson
9 justices joined the judgment (4 writing separately).

From the opinions

“The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court is reversed.”

— Justice The Court(majority)

What's next

Colorado and other states must follow the decision and cannot enforce Section 3 against federal candidates or officeholders. Congress is responsible for deciding whether and how Section 3 is enforced in that setting.

Documents

3

Docket activity

11
  • New analysis added

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

Show 6 more
  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • Status changed from null to decided

    Mar 8, 2026 · Court records

  • Status changed from decided to null

    Mar 8, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Mar 4, 2024 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jan 3, 2024 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

5
What did the Supreme Court rule in Trump v. Anderson?
The Court reversed Colorado's ballot decision and said states cannot enforce Section 3 against federal candidates and officeholders.
Who won Trump v. Anderson?
Trump won because the Court reversed the Colorado Supreme Court's decision excluding him from the primary ballot.
How did Trump v. Anderson affect presidential ballots?
States cannot remove federal candidates from presidential ballots by enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
What happens next after Trump v. Anderson?
States and lower courts must follow the decision. Congress has responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal candidates and officeholders.
Is Section 3 still the law after Trump v. Anderson?
Yes. The Court said states cannot enforce it against federal candidates and officeholders; Congress has that responsibility.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 5, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis