
Trump v. Anderson
The Court unanimously reversed Colorado's decision excluding Trump from the ballot under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. It held that states may not enforce Section 3 against federal candidates and officeholders; that responsibility belongs to Congress.
- Status
- Decided
- Appeal from
- Colorado Supreme Court
- Review granted
- Jan 5, 2024
- Argued
- Feb 8, 2024
- Decision released
- Mar 4, 2024
Decision briefing
The case in plain English
What happened
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Colorado could not remove Donald Trump from its 2024 presidential primary ballot. The Court decided that states do not have the power to enforce Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment against federal candidates.
Why it matters
This ruling ensures that a single state cannot decide who is eligible to run for federal office based on the 'insurrection' clause. It prevents a patchwork of different rules where some states might allow a candidate while others block them.
The big picture
The case centered on Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was written after the Civil War to keep former Confederates out of government. The Court had to decide if this old rule could be used by state officials today without a specific law from Congress.
What the justices said
The Court ruled unanimously to reverse the Colorado decision, with all nine justices agreeing that states cannot disqualify federal candidates under Section 3.
“Congress alone must decide whether Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies an individual.”
The bottom line
Only Congress, not individual states, has the authority to enforce the disqualification clause against federal office seekers.
What's next
The ruling ends efforts in other states to remove Trump from the ballot using the same legal theory. Observers will now watch how Congress or lower courts handle any future challenges regarding federal eligibility.
What was the core dispute in this case?
The dispute was whether Colorado could use the 14th Amendment to kick Donald Trump off the ballot for his actions on January 6. Colorado argued he was an insurrectionist who was no longer eligible for office.
What are the real-world consequences of this ruling?
The ruling keeps Donald Trump on the ballot in all states for the 2024 election. It stops other states from trying to disqualify him using their own state courts or election officials.
What is the specific legal rule the Court established?
The Court held that federal legislation is the exclusive vehicle through which Section 3 can be enforced against federal candidates. States only have the power to disqualify people from holding state offices.
What is the next procedural step after this decision?
The case returns to the lower courts to officially end the challenge against Trump's eligibility. Parties must now follow the Supreme Court's rule that only Congress can act on this issue.
How does this fit into a broader legal trend?
The decision shows the Court's preference for national uniformity in federal elections. It prevents individual states from having too much power over who can become the President of the entire country.
Where things stand
Timeline
Source note
How this page is sourced
Official case materials anchor this page. Reporting is used only to add context and explain the dispute in plain English.
Page data last refreshed Mar 30, 2026.
Primary materials
Documents & resources
Recent coverage
In the news
More to watch