No. 22-807October Term 2023Decided May 23, 2024
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
The Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina's congressional redistricting plan was not an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, finding that the lower court clearly erred in determining that race, rather than politics, was the predominant factor in drawing the district lines.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released May 23, 2024
- What it's about
The Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina's congressional redistricting plan was not an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, finding that the lower court clearly erred in determining that race, rather than politics, was the predominant factor in drawing the district lines. The Court emphasized that plaintiffs must disentangle race from politics when the two are correlated and generally must provide an alternative map to prove racial predominance.
Question presented
Does the South Carolina legislature’s redistricting map, which has the effect of moving tens of thousands of Black voters to a different district, constitute an impermissible racial gerrymander, even if the legislators’ purported intent was merely a political gerrymander?
- Case path
Federal district court / Decision released May 23, 2024
- Area
Elections, Civil Rights
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Mar 30, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials9
Supreme Court docket 22-807
docket | Mar 30, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Mar 30, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Mar 30, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Mar 8, 2026
Alexander
opinion | May 23, 2024
opinion
opinion | May 23, 2024
Reply
brief | Mar 26, 2024
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Mar 18, 2024
Jurisdictional Statement
brief | Feb 17, 2023