Skip to main content

No. 22-807October Term 2023Decided May 23, 2024

Docket 22-807October Term 2023 (2023–2024)

Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

The Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina's congressional redistricting plan was not an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, finding that the lower court clearly erred in determining that race, rather than politics, was the predominant factor in drawing the district lines.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 23, 2024
Case AcceptedMay 15, 2023
Arguments HeardOct 11, 2023
Decision ReleasedMay 23, 2024
What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina's congressional redistricting plan was not an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, finding that the lower court clearly erred in determining that race, rather than politics, was the predominant factor in drawing the district lines. The Court emphasized that plaintiffs must disentangle race from politics when the two are correlated and generally must provide an alternative map to prove racial predominance.

Question presented

Does the South Carolina legislature’s redistricting map, which has the effect of moving tens of thousands of Black voters to a different district, constitute an impermissible racial gerrymander, even if the legislators’ purported intent was merely a political gerrymander?

Case path

Federal district court / Decision released May 23, 2024

Area

Elections, Civil Rights