Skip to main content

No. 22-6389October Term 2023Decided May 23, 2024

Docket 22-6389October Term 2023 (2023–2024)

Justin Rashaad Brown, Petitioner v. United States

The Supreme Court ruled that a state drug conviction qualifies as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) if the drug was federally controlled at the time of the state conviction, even if it was later removed from federal schedules.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 23, 2024
Case AcceptedMay 15, 2023
Arguments HeardNov 27, 2023
Decision ReleasedMay 23, 2024
What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that a state drug conviction qualifies as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) if the drug was federally controlled at the time of the state conviction, even if it was later removed from federal schedules. The Court determined that ACCA requires a backward-looking approach to assess a defendant's prior criminal history based on the law in effect when the previous crimes were committed.

Question presented

Does the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporate the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released May 23, 2024

Area

Criminal Procedure, Gun Rights