No. 22-6389October Term 2023Decided May 23, 2024
Justin Rashaad Brown, Petitioner v. United States
The Supreme Court ruled that a state drug conviction qualifies as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) if the drug was federally controlled at the time of the state conviction, even if it was later removed from federal schedules.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released May 23, 2024
- What it's about
The Supreme Court ruled that a state drug conviction qualifies as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) if the drug was federally controlled at the time of the state conviction, even if it was later removed from federal schedules. The Court determined that ACCA requires a backward-looking approach to assess a defendant's prior criminal history based on the law in effect when the previous crimes were committed.
Question presented
Does the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporate the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released May 23, 2024
- Area
Criminal Procedure, Gun Rights
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Mar 30, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 22-6389
docket | Mar 30, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Mar 30, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Mar 30, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Mar 8, 2026
Brown
opinion | May 23, 2024
opinion
opinion | May 23, 2024
Petition
brief | Dec 21, 2022
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Nov 18, 2022