Skip to main content

No. 22-148October Term 2022Decided Jun 8, 2023

Docket 22-148October Term 2022 (2022–2023)

Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC

VIP Products created a dog toy parodying the iconic Jack Daniel's whiskey bottle.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 8, 2023
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardMar 22, 2023
Decision ReleasedJun 8, 2023
What it's about

VIP Products created a dog toy parodying the iconic Jack Daniel's whiskey bottle. The Supreme Court ruled that using another's trademark humorously on a commercial product is subject to standard trademark infringement and dilution analysis rather than receiving automatic First Amendment protection.

Question presented

1. Whether a commercial product using humor is subject to the same likelihood-of-confusion analysis applicable to other products under the Lanham Act, or must receive heightened First Amendment protection from trademark-infringement claims, where the brand owner must prove that the defendant"s use of the mark either is "not artistically relevant" or "explicitly misleads consumers"? 2. Whether a commercial product"s use of humor renders the product "noncommercial" under 15 U?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Jun 8, 2023

Area

First Amendment, Business and Regulation