Skip to main content

No. 22-1079October Term 2023Decided Jun 6, 2024

Docket 22-1079October Term 2023 (2023–2024)

Truck Insurance Exchange, Petitioner v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., et al.

The Supreme Court ruled that an insurer bearing financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims qualifies as a "party in interest" under the Bankruptcy Code, granting them the right to object to a Chapter 11 reorganization plan.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 6, 2024
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardMar 19, 2024
Decision ReleasedJun 6, 2024
What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that an insurer bearing financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims qualifies as a "party in interest" under the Bankruptcy Code, granting them the right to object to a Chapter 11 reorganization plan. The decision rejected the lower court's "insurance neutrality" doctrine, which had previously limited insurers' ability to participate unless their specific contract rights were directly altered.

Question presented

Is an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim a “party in interest” that may object to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Jun 6, 2024

Area

Decided Supreme Court case