No. 22-1079October Term 2023Decided Jun 6, 2024
Truck Insurance Exchange, Petitioner v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., et al.
The Supreme Court ruled that an insurer bearing financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims qualifies as a "party in interest" under the Bankruptcy Code, granting them the right to object to a Chapter 11 reorganization plan.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 6, 2024
- What it's about
The Supreme Court ruled that an insurer bearing financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims qualifies as a "party in interest" under the Bankruptcy Code, granting them the right to object to a Chapter 11 reorganization plan. The decision rejected the lower court's "insurance neutrality" doctrine, which had previously limited insurers' ability to participate unless their specific contract rights were directly altered.
Question presented
Is an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim a “party in interest” that may object to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Jun 6, 2024
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Mar 30, 2026
- Method
- Methodology