Skip to main content

No. 21-757October Term 2022Decided May 18, 2023

Docket 21-757October Term 2022 (2022–2023)

Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two of Amgen's patents for cholesterol-lowering drugs were invalid because they were too broad.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 18, 2023
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardMar 27, 2023
Decision ReleasedMay 18, 2023
What it's about

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two of Amgen's patents for cholesterol-lowering drugs were invalid because they were too broad. The Court found the patents failed to satisfy the Patent Act's enablement clause by claiming an entire class of antibodies without providing enough detail for a skilled person to make and use them.

Question presented

Whether the standard for determining the adequacy of the "written description of the invention" in a patent must be "in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains . ."?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit / Decision released May 18, 2023

Area

Decided Supreme Court case