Skip to main content

Reed v. Goertz

Updated Sep 5, 2026

In brief

Reed won: the federal filing deadline began after Texas's state-court DNA-testing litigation was fully over, not when the trial court first denied testing.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 6-3 · April 19, 2023 · Opinion by Justice Kavanaugh

What it’s about
Rodney Reed, a death row inmate, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence after state courts denied his request.
Who it affects
Prisoners seeking post-conviction DNA testing can finish the state appeal process before the federal lawsuit deadline begins. For example, a person whose trial-court request is denied can appeal in state court without losing time to file a federal challenge.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Reed v. Goertz
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court decided that the statute of limitations for such a lawsuit begins to run when the state-court litigation, including any appeals, officially ends.

The decision resolves a split among federal appeals courts over when the clock starts for these DNA-testing claims.

Question presented

Whether the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim challenging a state’s post-conviction DNA testing procedures begins to run when the state trial court denies the DNA testing, or only when the state appellate litigation is complete?

What the Court decided

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Kavanaughwrote the opinion
  2. Roberts
  3. Sotomayor
  4. Kagan
  5. Barrett
  6. Jackson
Dissenting · 3disagreed with the result
  1. Thomaswrote a dissent
  2. Alitowrote a dissent
  3. Gorsuch
6 justices joined the judgment, 3 dissented.

From the opinions

“The statute of limitations begins to run when the state litigation ends.”

— Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh(majority)

What's next

Lower courts must apply this timing rule to similar federal challenges to state DNA-testing procedures. Reed's case returns to proceed under the Court's ruling that his claim was filed on time.

Documents

3

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

Show 4 more
  • Case data updated: status, opinion_date

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Apr 19, 2023 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Sep 20, 2021 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

3
What did the Supreme Court rule in Reed v. Goertz?
The Court said the filing deadline starts when state-court DNA-testing litigation ends, including appeals. It does not start with the trial court's first denial.
Who is affected by Reed v. Goertz?
Prisoners challenging state post-conviction DNA-testing procedures in federal court are affected. They can complete state appeals before the federal deadline begins.
What happens next in Reed v. Goertz?
Lower courts must use the Supreme Court's timing rule in similar cases. Reed's lawsuit can continue under that rule.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 5, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis