
Bittner v. United States
Alexandru Bittner challenged a $2.72 million fine for failing to report his foreign bank accounts, arguing the penalty should be assessed per unfiled report rather than per unreported account. The Supreme Court agreed, ruling that the Bank Secrecy Act's $10,000 maximum penalty for nonwillful violations applies on a per-report basis.
- Status
- Decided
- Appeal from
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Review granted
- Jun 21, 2022
- Argued
- Nov 2, 2022
- Decision released
- Feb 28, 2023
Decision briefing
The case in plain English
What Happened
The Supreme Court ruled that the $10,000 penalty for failing to report foreign bank accounts applies to each annual form filed, not to each individual account listed on that form. The Court decided that a violation of the Bank Secrecy Act occurs when a person fails to file the required yearly report correctly.
Why It Matters
This decision prevents the government from charging massive fines to people who accidentally forget to report multiple foreign accounts. For example, a person with 10 accounts who makes a mistake on one annual form now faces a $10,000 penalty instead of a $100,000 penalty.
The Big Picture
The case clarifies how the government can punish nonwillful (accidental) mistakes regarding foreign financial disclosures. It balances the government's need for financial information with the protection of taxpayers from excessive fines for paperwork errors.
What the Justices Said
The Court ruled in favor of the taxpayer, determining that the Bank Secrecy Act's penalty for nonwillful violations is tied to the submission of the report itself.
“The $10,000 maximum penalty for the nonwillful failure to file a foreign bank account report applies on a per-report basis, rather than for each individual unreported account.”
The Bottom Line
Taxpayers who accidentally fail to report foreign accounts will only face one $10,000 fine per annual report rather than a fine for every single account.
What's Next
Lower courts and the IRS must now follow this per-report rule when calculating fines for accidental reporting errors. Affected parties who were previously overcharged may look for ways to challenge their past penalties based on this new standard.
What was the core dispute in this case?
The dispute was whether a violation of the Bank Secrecy Act meant failing to file one annual report or failing to report each individual bank account. The government wanted to charge a separate fine for every account not listed on the form.
What are the real-world consequences for taxpayers?
Taxpayers with many foreign accounts are now protected from massive, compounding fines for simple paperwork mistakes. This ruling significantly reduces the financial burden on individuals who inadvertently fail to disclose their international holdings.
What is the specific legal rule established by the Court?
The Court established that the $10,000 penalty for nonwillful violations applies to the annual report as a whole. A single late or incomplete form counts as one violation regardless of how many accounts it should have included.
What is the next procedural step for this issue?
Lower courts and federal agencies will now apply this per-report limit to pending cases involving foreign account penalties. Observers should watch how the IRS updates its enforcement guidelines to match the Supreme Court's interpretation.
How does this fit into broader legal trends?
The case reflects a trend of the Court limiting the government's ability to impose high fines for administrative errors. It ensures that penalties remain proportional to the actual filing requirement set by Congress.
Where things stand
Timeline
Source note
How this page is sourced
Official case materials anchor this page. Reporting is used only to add context and explain the dispute in plain English.
Page data last refreshed Mar 30, 2026.
Primary materials
Documents & resources
Key filings
Recent coverage
In the news
More to watch