Skip to main content

Troy-McKoy v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Parks & Recreation

Updated Sep 5, 2026

In brief

The lower court's judgment for the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation remains in effect because the Supreme Court declined review.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 26, 2020

What it’s about
The Supreme Court denied Troy-McKoy’s petition for review, leaving in place the lower court’s ruling granting summary judgment to the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation on her employment discrimination, retaliation, and hostile-work-environment claims.
Who it affects
Troy-McKoy cannot continue this case through Supreme Court review. Other workers with similar discrimination, retaliation, or hostile-work-environment claims remain subject to the lower courts' decisions in their own cases.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Troy-McKoy v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Parks & Recreation
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition challenged the lower court's treatment of employment-discrimination claims and the "cat's paw" theory, in which a biased employee may influence an employer's decision.

Question presented

1. Whether the Second Circuit erred in affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment on Petitioner's claims of discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment? 2. Whether the Second Circuit erred in its application of the "cat's paw" theory of liability?

What the Court decided

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished its action on this docket. The lower court's judgment remains in place.

Documents

3

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Troy-McKoy

    May 26, 2020 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Apr 14, 2020 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Feb 4, 2020 · Court records

More questions

3
What did the Supreme Court rule in Troy-McKoy v. N.Y.C. Department of Parks and Recreation?
The Court declined to hear the case and did not decide its merits. The lower court's judgment for the department stays in place.
Who is affected by the Troy-McKoy case?
Troy-McKoy is directly affected because her challenge ends at the Supreme Court. Workers with similar claims may still bring cases under the rules applied by lower courts.
What happens next in Troy-McKoy v. N.Y.C. Department of Parks and Recreation?
No further Supreme Court action is expected in this docket. The lower court's judgment remains effective.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 5, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis