Skip to main content

Brown v. United States

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court declined to hear Brown’s petition, so it did not rule on which drug-schedule version controls.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 18, 2020

What it’s about
This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in forma pauperis from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The specific facts and legal issues are not detailed in the available record.
Who it affects
The denial ended Brown’s request for Supreme Court review, but it left the date question undecided in this docket.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Brown v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

This was a Supreme Court review petition from the Fifth Circuit about how a prior state drug conviction is treated under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act.

Question presented

Whether the “categorical approach” for determining whether a prior conviction is a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), requires a court to look to the version of the federal drug schedules in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense, or the version in effect at the time of the prior state conviction?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Court has finished this docket action. The record contains no Supreme Court merits ruling on the question.

Documents

2

Docket activity

19
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

1
Did the denial endorse either side’s position?
No. Refusing to hear the petition was procedural and did not endorse either side’s arguments.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis