Mason v. United States
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear Mason’s case, leaving the D.C. Circuit’s ruling in place without deciding his claims.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 18, 2020
- What it’s about
- The Court denied Steven Mason’s petition for review, leaving the D.C. Circuit’s ruling in place.
- Who it affects
- The D.C. Circuit’s ruling remains in place for Mason; the Supreme Court did not decide his evidence-disclosure or separate-trial claims.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
Mason had challenged the government’s late disclosure of evidence and the refusal to separate his trial from a co-defendant’s trial; the denial did not decide those claims on the merits.
In his petition, Mason argued that a key witness had reportedly written a letter describing plans to lie against the other defendant, and that the government disclosed it too late. He also argued that a juror’s written note showed unfair spillover from the joint trial.
The case reached the Supreme Court through a petition asking it to review a ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Question presented
Whether the “occasions” clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), requires the government to prove that the prior offenses occurred on different occasions, and whether a court may look to non-elemental facts in Shepard documents to make that determination?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Its order leaves the D.C. Circuit’s ruling in place for Mason and provides no Supreme Court ruling on the underlying claims.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.