Medrano v. Frauenheim
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear Medrano's petition, so it did not rule on whether the state court applied federal law correctly.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 18, 2020
- What it’s about
- This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Medrano against Frauenheim, originating from the Ninth Circuit. The Supreme Court was asked to review the lower court's decision, with the petitioner seeking to proceed without paying court fees.
- Who it affects
- The order ends Supreme Court review for Medrano without deciding whether the state court violated federal law.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The petition came from a case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Question presented
Whether the state court’s decision was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, when it failed to apply the principles of People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665, to Petitioner’s case on habeas corpus review, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. The record shows no further step in this petition, and the order does not decide the legal question.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
More questions
- Did Medrano ask to proceed without paying court fees?
- Yes. The filing included a request to proceed without paying court fees.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.