Skip to main content

Medrano v. Frauenheim

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court refused to hear Medrano's petition, so it did not rule on whether the state court applied federal law correctly.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 18, 2020

What it’s about
This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Medrano against Frauenheim, originating from the Ninth Circuit. The Supreme Court was asked to review the lower court's decision, with the petitioner seeking to proceed without paying court fees.
Who it affects
The order ends Supreme Court review for Medrano without deciding whether the state court violated federal law.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Medrano v. Frauenheim
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition came from a case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Question presented

Whether the state court’s decision was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, when it failed to apply the principles of People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665, to Petitioner’s case on habeas corpus review, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. The record shows no further step in this petition, and the order does not decide the legal question.

Documents

2

Docket activity

21
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

1
Did Medrano ask to proceed without paying court fees?
Yes. The filing included a request to proceed without paying court fees.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis