Paz-Alvarez v. United States
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear the case, leaving the First Circuit’s ruling in place without deciding whether reckless offenses qualify as “crimes of violence” under the Guidelines.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 4, 2020
- What it’s about
- The Supreme Court denied review, leaving the First Circuit’s judgment in favor of the United States in place. The case concerned whether the Sentencing Guidelines’ definition of a “crime of violence” covers offenses committed recklessly.
- Who it affects
- The First Circuit’s ruling remained in place for Paz-Alvarez and the United States; the Supreme Court did not decide the Guidelines question.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The dispute concerned whether a federal sentencing rule treats an offense committed recklessly as a “crime of violence.”
Question presented
Whether the “use of physical force” clause in the “crime of violence” definition in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1) encompasses crimes that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this action. The First Circuit’s ruling remains in place for the parties.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.