Skip to main content

Paz-Alvarez v. United States

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court refused to hear the case, leaving the First Circuit’s ruling in place without deciding whether reckless offenses qualify as “crimes of violence” under the Guidelines.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 4, 2020

What it’s about
The Supreme Court denied review, leaving the First Circuit’s judgment in favor of the United States in place. The case concerned whether the Sentencing Guidelines’ definition of a “crime of violence” covers offenses committed recklessly.
Who it affects
The First Circuit’s ruling remained in place for Paz-Alvarez and the United States; the Supreme Court did not decide the Guidelines question.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Paz-Alvarez v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The dispute concerned whether a federal sentencing rule treats an offense committed recklessly as a “crime of violence.”

Question presented

Whether the “use of physical force” clause in the “crime of violence” definition in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1) encompasses crimes that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this action. The First Circuit’s ruling remains in place for the parties.

Documents

3

Docket activity

19
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis