Skip to main content

Rivera-Munoz v. United States

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court refused to hear Rivera-Munoz’s case and left whether Hobbs Act robbery is a “crime of violence” undecided.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 18, 2020

What it’s about
This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Rivera-Munoz against the United States, originating from the Ninth Circuit. The petitioner also requested permission to proceed without paying court fees.
Who it affects
The denial ended Rivera-Munoz’s request for Supreme Court review but did not decide the legal question in this case.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Rivera-Munoz v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition came from the Ninth Circuit, and Rivera-Munoz also asked to proceed without paying court fees.

Question presented

Whether Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), is a “crime of violence” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Supreme Court’s action on this petition is complete. This order supplies no ruling on the Hobbs Act question.

Documents

2

Docket activity

21
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis