Skip to main content

In re Smith

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court turned down Smith’s petition and left his claims about the Nevada district court and Ninth Circuit unresolved.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 4, 2020

What it’s about
Oscar Smith filed an application with the Supreme Court to stay his execution in Tennessee. The Court rejected the bid to block the execution, though he ultimately received a reprieve due to a state oversight.
Who it affects
The order ended this Supreme Court proceeding but did not decide whether either court violated Smith’s rights, exceeded its authority, or had to act.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for In re Smith
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition sought a special Supreme Court order directing two federal courts to act on pending filings.

Question presented

1. Whether the United States District Court for the District of Nevada and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have violated Petitioner’s rights to due process and equal protection of the laws by failing to rule on his pending motions and appeals in a timely manner? 2. Whether the United States District Court for the District of Nevada and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have exceeded their jurisdiction by failing to rule on Petitioner’s pending motions and appeals? 3. Whether Petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition directing the United States District Court for the District of Nevada and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to rule on his pending motions and appeals?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Supreme Court’s action on this docket is finished. No further Supreme Court step is identified, and the order does not resolve what the lower courts will do.

Documents

2

Docket activity

20
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

2
What did Smith ask the Supreme Court to order?
He asked it to direct the Nevada district court and the Ninth Circuit to rule on pending motions and appeals.
Did the denial issue a substantive opinion?
No. The decision record shows a petition denial, not a decision on the underlying legal questions.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis