White v. Se. Mich. Surgical Hosp.
In brief
The Supreme Court left the Michigan rulings for the defendants in place after refusing review; it did not decide White's constitutional or medical-malpractice claims.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · June 1, 2020
- What it’s about
- The Supreme Court denied White’s petition for review, leaving in place the Michigan courts’ rulings for the defendants in her medical-malpractice case.
- Who it affects
- The Michigan courts' rulings for the defendants remain in place, but the Supreme Court made no decision on White's claims.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The Court did not decide the merits of her claims about the right to a jury trial, due process, or Michigan’s medical-malpractice procedures.
The case arose from White's challenge to how Michigan courts applied the state's medical-malpractice statutes and court rules.
Question presented
1. Whether the Michigan Court of Appeals and the Michigan Supreme Court erred in affirming the trial court's grant of summary disposition in favor of the defendants, thereby denying the petitioner her right to a jury trial and due process of law? 2. Whether the lower courts' application of the Michigan medical malpractice statutes and court rules violated the petitioner's constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court's docket action is finished, and the Michigan rulings remain in effect. White's claims were not decided by the Supreme Court.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.