Skip to main content
Illustration for Jenkins v. Amsberry
Docket 19-8089October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Jenkins v. Amsberry

This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Jenkins against Amsberry, seeking review of a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Status
Before Arguments
Appeal from
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Briefing

What Happened

Jenkins has asked the Supreme Court to review a ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari (a request for the Supreme Court to hear an appeal) and a motion to proceed without paying court fees.

Why It Matters

The outcome could affect how lower courts handle similar legal challenges from individuals in the justice system. It specifically impacts people like Jenkins who are seeking to have their cases reviewed by the highest court in the country.

The Big Picture

This case is part of the Supreme Court's process for deciding which lower court decisions deserve a closer look. Most petitions are not granted, so the Court must determine if this specific dispute raises a significant legal question.

What the Justices Said

No substantive justice or advocate reactions are available yet.

The Bottom Line

Jenkins is seeking a Supreme Court review of a Ninth Circuit decision, but the Court has not yet decided whether to hear the case.

What's Next

The next major milestone is for the Court to decide whether to grant or deny the petition for certiorari. If granted, the case will move toward oral arguments where lawyers present their sides to the justices.

What is the core dispute in this case?

The case involves Jenkins challenging a decision made by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Jenkins is asking the Supreme Court to step in and review the lower court's findings.

What are the real-world consequences of this petition?

If the Court hears the case, it could clarify legal standards for individuals in the Ninth Circuit's jurisdiction. A denial would leave the current lower court ruling in place for Jenkins.

What legal rule is being discussed?

The case currently focuses on the rules for certiorari (the process for selecting cases). It also involves a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (permission to skip court fees due to poverty).

What is the next procedural step for the Court?

The justices will review the petition and decide if they want to add the case to their calendar. They may also ask for more information from the opposing party, Amsberry.

How does this fit into a broader trend?

This case represents the thousands of petitions the Court receives each year from individuals seeking to overturn lower court rulings. Very few of these requests are eventually chosen for a full hearing.

Timeline

Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming

Sources

Docket plus reporting.

Refreshed Mar 10, 2026.

Coverage