Rodrigues v. Massachusetts
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear Rodrigues's case and left the Massachusetts Appeals Court's ruling in place, without deciding the jury-unanimity question.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 26, 2020
- What it’s about
- The Supreme Court denied Rodrigues’s petition for review, leaving the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s ruling in place.
- Who it affects
- The Massachusetts Appeals Court's ruling remains in place for Rodrigues, but the Supreme Court did not decide whether the Constitution requires unanimous verdicts in these state cases.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
Rodrigues had argued that the Sixth Amendment requires state criminal convictions for non-petty offenses to be based on unanimous jury verdicts.
The dispute arose from a Massachusetts state criminal case and reached the Supreme Court through Rodrigues's request to review the Appeals Court's ruling.
Question presented
Whether the Sixth Amendment’s right to a jury trial, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, requires a unanimous jury verdict to convict a defendant of a non-petty offense?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. No further Supreme Court review or merits ruling is shown in this case.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.