Skip to main content

Berryman v. Haas

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

Instead of deciding the legal questions, the Supreme Court refused to hear the case and left the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in place.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 18, 2020

What it’s about
The Supreme Court denied Berryman’s petition for review, leaving in place the Sixth Circuit’s ruling that he had to use the prison grievance process again after officials allegedly failed to honor an earlier Step I grievance resolution.
Who it affects
The Sixth Circuit’s grievance-process requirement remains in place for Berryman; the Supreme Court did not decide whether private jury selection violated the Sixth Amendment.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Berryman v. Haas
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court did not decide the merits of his claim.

Berryman alleged that prison officials failed to honor an earlier first-step grievance resolution. The Sixth Circuit required him to use the grievance process again.

The case reached the Supreme Court through a petition asking for review of the Sixth Circuit’s procedural ruling about prison grievances, rather than through a Supreme Court decision on the underlying legal questions.

Question presented

1. Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial applies to the jury selection process, specifically the "for cause" and "peremptory" challenge phase of voir dire? 2. Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial is violated when the trial court conducts the "for cause" and "peremptory" challenge phase of voir dire in a private room, off the record, and outside the presence of the public? 3. Whether trial counsel's failure to object to the closure of the courtroom during the "for cause" and "peremptory" challenge phase of voir dire constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Supreme Court’s docket action is finished. Berryman must follow the Sixth Circuit’s requirement to use the grievance process again.

Documents

2

Docket activity

18
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis