Skip to main content

In re Findlay

Updated Sep 5, 2026

In brief

The Court left the Florida courts' result in place without deciding the underlying due-process question.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 18, 2020

What it’s about
The Court denied review, leaving in place the Florida courts’ handling of Findlay’s rehearing motion.
Who it affects
The Florida courts' handling of Findlay's rehearing motion remains in place. This matters to people who file court papers on time but send them first to the wrong court.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for In re Findlay
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition argued that due process required a motion timely filed in the wrong court to be treated as filed on that date after it was transferred to the proper court.

The dispute concerns whether due process protects a litigant from losing a timely filing because it was initially sent to the wrong court.

Question presented

1. Whether the United States Supreme Court should grant a writ of habeas corpus to correct a fundamental miscarriage of justice where the petitioner is being held in custody in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States? 2. Whether the petitioner's conviction and sentence for a crime he did not commit, based on a fundamentally flawed and unconstitutional trial, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments? 3. Whether the petitioner's right to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment was violated when his trial counsel failed to investigate and present evidence of his innocence?

What the Court decided

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished its action on this docket. The Florida courts' treatment of the rehearing motion remains effective.

Documents

2

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Jul 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: In re Findlay

    May 18, 2020 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Feb 18, 2020 · Court records

More questions

3
What did the Supreme Court do in In re Findlay?
The Court declined to review the case. It did not decide whether due process required the rehearing motion to be treated as timely.
Who is affected by In re Findlay?
People who timely file a court paper in the wrong court may be affected. The case concerned whether transfer preserves the original filing date.
What happens next in In re Findlay?
The Supreme Court's docket action is complete. The Florida courts' handling of Findlay's rehearing motion remains in place.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 5, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis