Skip to main content

No. 19-7736October Term 2019Decided Apr 20, 2020Updated Sep 3, 2026

Docket 19-7736October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Woods v. Wash. Metro. Transit Auth.

The Supreme Court declined review, leaving the lower court's result in place without deciding the merits.

Case status

Decided · April 20, 2020

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Apr 20, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedApr 20, 2020
What it's about

This is a pending case where the petitioner is asking the Supreme Court to review a lower court decision involving the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, while also requesting permission to proceed without paying standard filing fees.

Question presented

1. Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's complaint for failure to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act? 2. Whether the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity by accepting federal funds? 3. Whether the petitioner was denied due process and equal protection when the lower courts dismissed the case without a hearing?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Decision released Apr 20, 2020

Area

Civil Rights

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court declined review, leaving the lower court's result in place without deciding the merits.

Impact

The lower-court dismissal remains in place for Woods. People bringing similar disability-discrimination claims against WMATA may face the same lower-court barriers.

Not official Court text.

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court declined to review Woods's challenge to the dismissal of claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act against WMATA. The Court did not decide the merits of those legal questions.

Impact

The lower-court dismissal remains in place for Woods. People bringing similar disability-discrimination claims against WMATA may face the same lower-court barriers.

What's next

The Supreme Court's docket action is complete. The lower-court dismissal remains in place.

What did the Supreme Court rule in Woods v. WMATA?

The Court declined to review the case. It did not decide whether the lower court correctly dismissed Woods's claims.

Who is affected by Woods v. WMATA?

Woods is directly affected because the lower-court dismissal remains in place. Similar claimants against WMATA may face the same legal barriers.

What happens next in Woods v. WMATA?

The Supreme Court has completed its action on the case. The lower court's result remains in effect.

Timing

Decided April 20, 2020

The Court released its decision on April 20, 2020 without hearing oral argument.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 3, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Petition

    Feb 20, 2020 | Court records