Skip to main content

No. 19-7509October Term 2019Decided May 4, 2020

Docket 19-7509October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

In re Mattison

The Supreme Court closed the case without granting Mattison the extraordinary relief he requested.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 4, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMay 4, 2020
What it's about

This case involves a petition filed with the Supreme Court under the title In re Mattison. Specific details regarding the underlying facts and legal issues are not available in the provided record.

Question presented

1. Whether the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, abused its discretion and/or exceeded its jurisdiction by failing to rule on Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration and/or Motion to Vacate Judgment, which has been pending for over two years? 2. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit abused its discretion and/or exceeded its jurisdiction by failing to rule on Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus, which has been pending for over one year? 3. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition from this Court directing the lower courts to rule on his pending motions and/or petitions?

Case path

Decision released May 4, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

Mattison asked the Supreme Court for an extraordinary order directing lower federal courts to act on motions and a mandamus request that he said had been pending too long. The available record indicates the Supreme Court declined review and did not decide whether those lower courts acted improperly.

Vote

The available record does not provide a vote count or opinion lineup, and the case was not scheduled for argument.

Impact

That means Mattison did not get the immediate Supreme Court order he wanted. For people waiting on lower-court action, this shows the justices often refuse to step in through rare emergency-style requests.

What's next

There is no further action in this Supreme Court docket. Any remaining relief would have to come, if at all, from lower courts or through other available procedures outside this closed case.

What was the main dispute in In re Mattison?

Mattison asked the Supreme Court to force lower courts to rule on filings he said had been left unresolved for years. He also tied the request to his effort to challenge an earlier Virginia conviction.

What are the real-world consequences of the Court's action here?

Mattison did not get a Supreme Court order requiring the lower courts to act. More broadly, people with delayed cases should not assume the justices will intervene through mandamus (an order commanding action).

What happens next after this Supreme Court docket closed?

This Supreme Court case is over. If Mattison wants more relief, he would need to pursue whatever options remain in the lower courts or in a separate proceeding.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court closed the case without granting Mattison the extraordinary relief he requested.

Impact

That means Mattison did not get the immediate Supreme Court order he wanted. For people waiting on lower-court action, this shows the justices often refuse to step in through rare emergency-style requests.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jun 2, 2026
Primary materials7
Context reporting2