Skip to main content
Illustration for Price v. United States
Docket 19-7479October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

Price v. United States

This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari filed against the United States, originating from the First Circuit. The specific facts and legal issues are not detailed in the available records.

Status
Before Arguments
Appeal from
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Briefing

What Happened

The Supreme Court is reviewing whether a state-level drug conviction counts as a 'serious drug offense' under federal law if the state law does not require the person to know the drugs were illegal. This case comes from the First Circuit and focuses on how federal courts should treat state 'delivery' crimes when calculating prison sentences.

Why It Matters

The outcome will determine how long certain defendants stay in prison under the Armed Career Criminal Act. If the Court rules for the defendant, people with specific state-level drug convictions might receive shorter federal sentences.

The Big Picture

This case is part of a long-running debate over how strictly federal courts should interpret state criminal laws. It highlights the tension between federal sentencing rules and the different ways states define drug crimes.

What the Justices Said

No substantive justice or advocate reactions are available yet.

The Bottom Line

The Court must decide if a state drug crime counts toward a federal 'career criminal' status even if the defendant did not know the substance was illicit.

What's Next

The next major milestone is for the Court to schedule oral arguments. After the arguments, the justices will meet in private to vote and eventually release a written opinion.

What is the core dispute in Price v. United States?

The dispute is whether a state conviction for delivering drugs counts as a serious federal offense. This applies even if the state law does not require the person to know the drugs were illegal.

What are the real-world consequences of this case?

Defendants could face much longer prison terms if their past state crimes are labeled as serious drug offenses. A ruling for the government would keep these strict sentencing rules in place.

What legal rule is the Supreme Court interpreting?

The Court is interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act, specifically the definition of a 'serious drug offense.' They are looking at whether state 'delivery' laws match the federal definition.

What is the next procedural step for this case?

The Court will schedule a date for oral arguments where lawyers for both sides present their views. After that, the justices will deliberate and write their final decision.

How does this case fit into a broader legal trend?

It follows a trend of the Court clarifying how federal sentencing laws interact with varying state criminal codes. These cases often decide how much power federal judges have to increase prison time.

Timeline

Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming

Sources

Docket plus reporting.

Refreshed Mar 10, 2026.

Coverage