Skip to main content
Illustration for Wilkerson v. Alabama
Docket 19-6006

Wilkerson v. Alabama

This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari submitted to Justice Thomas regarding a criminal judgment from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Status
Decided
Appeal from
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decision released
May 18, 2020

Decision briefing

The case in plain English

Start with the holding, why it matters, and the strongest takeaways from the opinions.

What Happened

The Supreme Court declined to hear a case involving a criminal judgment from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. The case focused on whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments require trial courts to let defendants ask potential jurors if they would automatically vote for the death penalty.

Why It Matters

This decision leaves the lower court's ruling in place, affecting how jury selection is handled in Alabama capital murder cases. It means defendants in that jurisdiction may face different limits on questioning jurors compared to other states.

The Big Picture

The case touches on the constitutional right to an impartial jury and the specific procedures used to ensure jurors are fair in death penalty cases. It highlights the ongoing debate over how much control defendants should have during the jury selection process.

What the Justices Said

The Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari (a request for the Court to review the case) on May 18, 2020.

The Bottom Line

The Supreme Court chose not to review the Alabama court's decision, letting the existing ruling against the defendant stand.

What's Next

Observers should watch how lower courts and legal teams in Alabama respond to this outcome. The ruling maintains the current standards for jury questioning in the state's criminal justice system.

What was the core dispute in this case?

The dispute centered on whether a defendant can ask potential jurors if they would automatically choose the death penalty. The defendant argued this was necessary for a fair trial.

What are the real-world consequences of this decision?

Defendants in Alabama may have less power to screen jurors for specific biases regarding the death penalty. This could influence the final makeup of juries in capital cases.

What legal rule was at the center of the petition?

The petition focused on the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. These amendments guarantee the right to a fair trial and an impartial jury.

What is the next procedural step for this case?

Because the Supreme Court denied the request for review, the case is effectively over at this level. The lower court's original judgment remains final.

How does this fit into a broader legal trend?

The Court often declines to hear cases that challenge state-level criminal procedures. This reflects a trend of letting state courts handle specific trial management issues.

Where things stand

Timeline

Key court milestones at a glance.

Case Accepted
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedMay 18, 2020

Source note

How this page is sourced

Official case materials anchor this page. Reporting is used only to add context and explain the dispute in plain English.

Page data last refreshed Mar 30, 2026.

Primary materials

Documents & resources

Briefs, opinions, transcripts, and audio when they are available.

Recent coverage

In the news

Selected reporting and analysis that can help you follow the public conversation around the case.

More to watch

Related cases on the docket

Other live cases with a similar posture, so readers can move across the docket without losing the thread.