Brooks v. Louisiana
In brief
The Supreme Court wiped out (vacated) the Louisiana judgment and sent Brooks's case back to the lower court (remanded); it did not finally decide his constitutional claim.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · April 27, 2020
- What it’s about
- The Supreme Court granted review, vacated the Louisiana court’s judgment, and sent Michael Brooks’s case back for reconsideration in light of Ramos v.
- Who it affects
- The Louisiana court must take another look at Brooks's case under Ramos, which required unanimous verdicts for serious state crimes. The Supreme Court left open whether Brooks properly raised the issue below, so his final result remains unresolved.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
Louisiana, which held that the Sixth Amendment requires unanimous jury verdicts to convict defendants of serious crimes in state court. The ruling favored Brooks because it required Louisiana courts to reconsider his conviction under that rule.
This order applied Ramos to another Louisiana case without deciding Brooks's constitutional claim itself.
Question presented
Whether the Sixth Amendment’s right to a jury trial—as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment—requires a unanimous verdict to convict a defendant of a serious offense?
What the Court decided
Holding
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Ramos v. Louisiana , 590 U. S. ___ (2020). Justice Alito, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand: In this and in all other cases in which the Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of Ramos v. Louisiana , I concur in the judgment on the understanding that the Court is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand. Justice Thomas would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.
- Result
- Vacated
What's next
The lower court will reconsider Brooks's case in light of Ramos. It will also decide whether Brooks properly raised the issue, a question the Supreme Court left open.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
New analysis added
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Show 2 moreShow fewer
Status changed from pending to decided
Brief added: Petition
More questions
- What was the constitutional issue in Brooks v. Louisiana?
- It concerned whether the Constitution requires a unanimous jury verdict to convict someone of a serious offense in state court.
- What did the Supreme Court do in Brooks v. Louisiana?
- It wiped out Louisiana's judgment (vacated) and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded) in light of Ramos. It did not finally decide the constitutional question.
- What remains unresolved in Brooks's case?
- The lower court must decide whether Brooks properly raised the unanimity issue. The Supreme Court left that question open.
- What happens next in Brooks v. Louisiana?
- The lower court will reconsider the case under Ramos. Sending the case back does not establish Brooks's final result.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.