Skip to main content

General Dynamics v. United States

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court wiped out the ruling it reviewed and sent the case back, directing that the parties stay where they were when suit began if state secrets block an apparently valid defense.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · May 23, 2011 · Opinion by Justice Scalia

What it’s about
The U.S. government sued defense contractors for breach of contract, but the contractors could not defend themselves without revealing classified information.
Who it affects
The rule applies when a court blocks a government contractor’s apparently valid defense to the government’s contract-breach claim to protect state secrets.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for General Dynamics Corp. v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that when the state secrets privilege prevents a contractor from raising a valid defense, the courts must dismiss the case and leave the parties where they were.

The state-secrets doctrine protects sensitive government information from disclosure in court.

Question presented

Can the government sue a federal contractor for breach of contract then use the state secrets doctrine to prevent the contractor from raising a defense that would require the contractor to disclose secret information?

What the Court decided

Holding

When, to protect state secrets, a court dismisses a Government contractor’s prima facie valid affirmative defense to the Government’s allegations of contractual breach, the proper remedy is to leave the parties where they were on the day they filed suit. Pp. 5– 14. 567 F. 3d 1340, vacated and remanded.

Result
Vacated

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Roberts
  2. Scaliawrote the opinion
  3. Kennedy
  4. Thomas
  5. Ginsburg
  6. Breyer
  7. Alito
  8. Sotomayor
  9. Kagan
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The case returns to the lower court, which must apply the Supreme Court’s rule.

Documents

3

Docket activity

12
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 7 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: term, opinion_date

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 3, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: term, status, opinion_date

    Jul 25, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - General Dynamics Corp. v. United States

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: General Dynamics

    May 23, 2011 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Sep 28, 2010 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis