No. 01-408October Term 2001Decided Jun 3, 2002
Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.
```json
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 3, 2002
- What it's about
```json { "summary": "The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit lacks jurisdiction over a case where the only patent law issues appear in a defendant's counterclaim rather than the plaintiff's original complaint. The decision reinforced the \"well-pleaded complaint rule,\" establishing that federal patent jurisdiction depends solely on the claims asserted by the plaintiff.", "questionPresented": "Does the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have appellate jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a claim arising under federal patent law, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim?" } ```
Question presented
Does the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have appellate jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a claim arising under federal patent law, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit / Decision released Jun 3, 2002
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Timing
Decided June 3, 2002
The Court released its decision 76 days after oral argument on March 19, 2002. The median for cases argued in March is 83 days.
Documents
Opinions
Scalia, Stevens, Ginsburg, O'Connor
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Mar 30, 2026
- Method
- Methodology