No. 01-408October Term 2001Decided Jun 3, 2002
Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.
```json
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 3, 2002
- What it's about
```json { "summary": "The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit lacks jurisdiction over a case where the only patent law issues appear in a defendant's counterclaim rather than the plaintiff's original complaint. The decision reinforced the \"well-pleaded complaint rule,\" establishing that federal patent jurisdiction depends solely on the claims asserted by the plaintiff.", "questionPresented": "Does the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have appellate jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a claim arising under federal patent law, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim?" } ```
Question presented
Does the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have appellate jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a claim arising under federal patent law, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit / Decision released Jun 3, 2002
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Documents
Opinions
Scalia, Stevens, Ginsburg, O'Connor
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Mar 30, 2026
- Method
- Methodology