Skip to main content

Emergency application

Rosemary Helen Ziziros Walker v. Purdue Pharmaceuticals

Denied
No. 26A613Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice KaganFrom Supreme Court of Oregon

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on November 1, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 11 days after filing

What's being asked

Rosemary Helen Ziziros Walker, a private party, asks the U.S. Supreme Court to temporarily pause a ruling by the Supreme Court of Oregon in her case against Purdue Pharmaceuticals and others. The record does not say what the Oregon court ruled or what the underlying dispute concerns.

What the Court did

Justice Kagan refused Walker's request to pause the Oregon ruling (denied the application). The Court did not publish how the justices voted; the order does not decide who wins the underlying case.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 293 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 29 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 11 days after filing.

What it means

This emergency ruling addresses only Walker's request for a temporary pause; it does not decide who wins the underlying case. The Supreme Court of Oregon's ruling remains in effect. No related merits case is listed, and no argument was set.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A613. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked November 2, 2026