Skip to main content

Emergency application

In Re Stephen J. Williams

Denied
No. 26A417Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice Sotomayor

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on September 28, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 14 days after filing

What's being asked

Stephen J. Williams, a private party, asks the Supreme Court to recall (take back) and temporarily pause a mandate, a formal lower-court order. The docket does not explain what the underlying dispute concerns or identify the court that issued the mandate.

What the Court did

The emergency request was refused: Justice Sotomayor denied (turned down) Williams’s request to recall (take back) and temporarily pause the mandate. The docket does not explain the denial, and it does not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 306 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 30 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 14 days after filing.

What it means

This emergency ruling does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The docket lists a related merits case, No. 25-7625, but does not identify a lower court or say what proceedings continue there. No argument was set for this application.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A417. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked November 10, 2026