Skip to main content

Emergency application

Manjeet K. Kang v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, dba Mr. Cooper

Denied
No. 26A399Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice KaganFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on September 24, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 9 days after filing

What's being asked

Manjeet K. Kang and others, all private parties, ask the Supreme Court to cancel and temporarily pause the Ninth Circuit mandate. The mandate is the formal order putting the appeals court's decision into effect. The record does not explain their dispute with Nationstar Mortgage, which does business as Mr. Cooper.

What the Court did

Justice Kagan refused the requested emergency help, denying the application (turning it down). The order does not decide who wins the dispute, and the Court did not publish a vote.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 300 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 28 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 9 days after filing.

What it means

This emergency ruling concerns only temporary relief and does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The record names the Ninth Circuit but does not say what proceedings continue there. The docket lists no related Supreme Court case on the main question and no argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A399. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked November 3, 2026