Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Emergency application

Pausing a court ruling

Faline Arnold v. Huntington Ingalls Industries

Denied
No. 26A38Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to The Chief JusticeFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on July 16, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 16 days after filing

What's being asked

Faline Arnold, a private party, asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause a Fourth Circuit ruling in her dispute with Huntington Ingalls Industries. The record does not explain what the dispute or ruling concerns.

What the Court did

The Chief Justice refused Arnold’s request for emergency help, so the Fourth Circuit ruling was not paused. The order does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 252 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 30 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 16 days after filing.

What it means

This emergency ruling is temporary and does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The Fourth Circuit ruling remains in effect. The record lists no related Supreme Court case or argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A38. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026