Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Emergency application

Aderonke Aderemi v. Massandra KV Vineyards Owner LLC

Denied
No. 26A375Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice AlitoFrom Supreme Court of Texas

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on September 22, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 7 days after filing

What's being asked

Aderonke Aderemi asks the Supreme Court to pause a Texas Supreme Court ruling in a case against Massandra KV Vineyards Owner LLC. Aderemi is identified as a private party. The record does not say what the dispute is about.

What the Court did

Justice Alito refused the requested temporary pause and denied (turned down) the application. The Court did not publish how the justices voted. The order does not decide who wins the underlying case.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 300 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 28 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 7 days after filing.

What it means

The Texas Supreme Court ruling was not paused; this emergency ruling does not decide who wins the underlying case. No related case on the underlying dispute is listed, and the Court set no argument.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A375. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked November 3, 2026