Skip to main content

Emergency application

Charles F. Cheleden v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation

Denied
No. 26A374Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice ThomasFrom District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on September 23, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 9 days after filing

What's being asked

Charles F. Cheleden asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause a ruling by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal. The record does not say what the ruling or dispute with the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation concerned.

What the Court did

Justice Thomas refused Cheleden’s request for emergency help, leaving the lower-court ruling unpaused. The order did not decide the underlying dispute, and the Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 300 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 28 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 9 days after filing.

What it means

The request sought only a temporary pause, so its denial does not decide who wins the dispute. The record names Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal as the lower court but does not say what happens there next. No related case asking the Supreme Court to decide the main legal question is listed, and no argument is set.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A374. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked November 3, 2026