Skip to main content

Emergency application

Pausing an appeals court ruling

Lisa Richardson Henderson v. Showcase Home Improvements, Inc., dba Kenneth Ferber

Denied
No. 26A299Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to The Chief JusticeFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on September 8, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 13 days after filing

What's being asked

Lisa Richardson Henderson asks the Chief Justice to take back and temporarily pause the Fourth Circuit's mandate, its formal order carrying out the ruling. The record does not say what her dispute with Showcase Home Improvements, Inc., doing business as Kenneth Ferber, concerns.

What the Court did

The Chief Justice refused emergency help and denied Henderson's application. The order gives no explanation, and the Court did not publish how the justices voted. This refusal does not decide who wins the underlying dispute.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 273 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 29 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 13 days after filing.

What it means

The denial addressed only Henderson's request for a temporary pause; it did not decide who wins the dispute. The Fourth Circuit's mandate remains in effect. No related Supreme Court merits case exists, and the Court set no argument on this application.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A299. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 6, 2026