Skip to main content

Emergency application

Employer benefits and union votes

NP Red Rock LLC, d/b/a Red Rock Casino Resort Spa v. National Labor Relations Board

Denied
No. 26A289Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to The Chief JusticeFrom United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on September 4, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 6 days after filing

What's being asked

Casino operator NP Red Rock LLC asks the Supreme Court to pause the D.C. Circuit’s mandate (its formal order putting the judgment into effect). The company also seeks Supreme Court review. The dispute concerns a National Labor Relations Board order requiring the casino to bargain with a union. Red Rock says the case raises whether granting benefits can support that order and whether the Board considered current circumstances.

What the Court did

The Chief Justice refused Red Rock’s request to pause the D.C. Circuit’s mandate and denied the application (turned down the request). That emergency ruling does not decide who wins the underlying labor dispute. The Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 273 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 29 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 6 days after filing.

What it means

This emergency ruling addresses only a temporary pause, not who wins the underlying case. The D.C. Circuit’s judgment remains in place; the docket lists no related Supreme Court case on the underlying dispute or argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A289. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 6, 2026