Skip to main content

Emergency application

Emergency court orders

Chiddy Golden v. Transunion, LLC

Awaiting action
No. 26A237Injunction applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice KaganFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Has the Court ruled?

Not yet. The Court has not ruled on the request.

It was filed August 18, 2026.

Filed

What's being asked

Chiddy Golden asks the Supreme Court for an emergency injunction (a court order requiring or stopping an action) while an appeal continues. The record does not explain the dispute with TransUnion, LLC, and other named parties or describe the Ninth Circuit ruling at issue.

What happens next

The Supreme Court has not ruled and can act at any time, with or without an explanation. No response deadline was requested, and the request was not referred to the full Court. No temporary pause (administrative stay) is in place, and no argument is set. The Court can approve the request, turn it down, or approve part of it.

Half of 273 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 29 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one's latest docket entry came 43 days after filing.

What it means

An emergency ruling would be temporary and would not decide who wins the underlying dispute. If granted, the injunction would put the requested court order in place while the appeal continues in the Ninth Circuit. The record does not say what action the order would affect or list a related case about the main legal questions.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A237. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 7, 2026