Skip to main content

Emergency application

Extradition and torture protection

Masahide Kanayama v. Scott Kowal, Chief of U.S. Pretrial Services SDNY

Denied
No. 25A962Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice SotomayorFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on March 3, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 1 day after filing

What's being asked

Masahide Kanayama, a Japanese citizen and U.S. lawful permanent resident, asks the Court to pause his extradition. He says the State Department’s extradition decision conflicts with protections against torture, and his pending asylum application may justify temporary relief. His filing says the Southern District of New York refused to pause extradition, but his underlying petition remains pending. The Second Circuit also refused an emergency pause, according to his filing.

What the Court did

Justice Sotomayor refused the emergency request and denied the application (turned it down); this does not decide Kanayama’s underlying legal claims. The Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 215 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 34 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 1 day after filing.

What it means

The denial addresses only whether to pause extradition temporarily; it does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. His filing says his petition remains pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The docket lists no related Supreme Court case on the main legal questions and no argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A962. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026