Skip to main content

Emergency application

Linh Tran Stephens v. Child Support Services of Oklahoma Department of Human Services

Denied
No. 25A913Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice GorsuchFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on February 20, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 20 days after filing

What's being asked

Linh Tran Stephens asked the Supreme Court to temporarily pause a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The record names Oklahoma's Child Support Services and Department of Human Services, but gives no details about the dispute or ruling.

What the Court did

The Supreme Court refused emergency help: Justice Gorsuch denied (turned down) Linh Tran Stephens's request to pause the Tenth Circuit ruling. The Court did not publish how the justices voted, and the denial does not decide the underlying dispute.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 215 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 34 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 20 days after filing.

What it means

The Tenth Circuit ruling remains in place; this emergency decision only addresses a temporary pause, not who wins the underlying dispute. The docket lists no related Supreme Court case, and no argument is set.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A913. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026