Skip to main content

Emergency application

Social Security dispute

Kevin Michael Jones v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Denied
No. 25A39Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to The Chief JusticeFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on July 17, 2025: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 17 days after filing

What's being asked

Kevin Michael Jones asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The record does not say what that ruling decided or what his dispute with Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano concerns.

What the Court did

The Chief Justice refused Jones’s request for emergency help (denied the application), so the Fourth Circuit ruling was not paused. This emergency ruling does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The docket does not report how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 302 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 28 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 17 days after filing.

What it means

The emergency ruling addresses only temporary relief; it does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The Fourth Circuit ruling remains in effect, and the docket lists no related merits case or argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A39. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026