Emergency application
Returning children across borders
Samantha Estefania Francisco Castro v. Jose Leonardo Brito Guevara
What did the Court do?
The Court denied the request on November 13, 2025: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.
Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case. Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson would have ruled the other way.
What's being asked
Samantha Estefania Francisco Castro asks the Supreme Court for a stay (a temporary pause) of the Fifth Circuit ruling for Jose Leonardo Brito Guevara. The application identifies Brito's petition under the Hague Convention and Castro's “well-settled” defense as the dispute. It says the Northern District of Texas denied the petition before the Fifth Circuit ruled for Brito.
What the Court did
The Court refused Castro's emergency request, denying the stay (a temporary pause), but let Brito file extra case papers under seal (not public). It wiped out (vacated) Justice Alito's earlier order temporarily keeping the Fifth Circuit ruling from taking effect. Justices Sotomayor and Jackson would have granted the request; the order gives no full vote and does not decide who wins the underlying dispute.
- Dissented
- Vote not published
What it means
This ruling concerns only emergency relief; it does not decide who wins the underlying case. The Fifth Circuit's ruling is no longer temporarily paused. No related Supreme Court case on the main question is listed, and no argument date is set.
Sources
Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A376. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.