Skip to main content

Emergency application

New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Jeffrey Colt

Granted
No. 25A287Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice SotomayorFrom Court of Appeals of New York

What did the Court do?

The Court granted the request on September 19, 2025: the lower court's ruling is on hold while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 8 days after filing

What's being asked

A private party asks the Supreme Court to pause (stay) a lower-court ruling from the Court of Appeals of New York while the appeal continues. The case is New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Jeffrey Colt.

What the Court did

Application (25A287) for stay presented to Justice Sotomayor and by her referred to the Court is granted. The Court has already granted certiorari on the sovereign immunity issue decided below, and the pending damages trial before the Supreme Court of the State of New York would be barred if New Jersey Transit Corporation were entitled to sovereign immunity from suit. Respondents, on the other hand, identify no tangible irreparable harm they would face if the trial were delated until after this Court decides the pending case. The trial scheduled for September 15, 2025, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, is therefore stayed pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court in <i>NJ Transit Corp., et al.</i> v. <i>Colt, Jeffrey, et al.</i>, case No. 24-1113, and <i>Galette, Cedric</i> v. <i>NJ Transit Corp.</i>, case No. 24-1021.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Thomas
  2. Roberts
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Days from filing to a ruling for 129 rulings on applications decided without a response since January 1, 2025. The band is the middle half, the tick the median, and the mark this application: ruled 8 days after filing.

What it means

This is a temporary order about what happens while the case is decided, not a ruling on who is right. The case continues in the Court of Appeals of New York.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A287. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked September 25, 2026