Skip to main content

Emergency application

Vincent Cannady v. United States

Denied
No. 25A262Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice SotomayorFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on September 8, 2025: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 6 days after filing

What's being asked

Vincent Cannady asks for emergency help to temporarily pause a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The docket does not say what that ruling or the underlying dispute concerns.

What the Court did

Justice Sotomayor refused the emergency request, denying (turning down) Cannady's request to pause the Second Circuit ruling. The docket gives no explanation and says the Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 300 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 28 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 6 days after filing.

What it means

The denial refuses only a temporary pause; it does not decide who wins the underlying case. The Second Circuit ruling is not paused, and the docket lists no related merits case or argument.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A262. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026