Emergency application
Tamika D. Pless v. State Employees' Credit Union.
What did the Court do?
The Court denied the request on August 25, 2025: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.
Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.
What's being asked
Tamika D. Pless asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause the Fourth Circuit's ruling in her dispute with State Employees' Credit Union. The record does not explain what the dispute is about or what the appeals court decided.
What the Court did
The Chief Justice refused Pless's request for a temporary pause (denied it), leaving the Fourth Circuit ruling unpaused. The docket says no vote was published. The denial does not decide who wins the underlying dispute.
What it means
A stay would have been a temporary pause; refusing it leaves the Fourth Circuit's ruling unpaused, but does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The docket lists no related case about the main dispute, and no argument is set.
Sources
Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A211. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.